Quantify the intake profile of treatment fluid along the wellbore.
Published: 10/31/2017
Published: 10/31/2017
An operator in Ecuador needed to acquire real-time data during well production evaluations in an onshore subhydrostatic well. Conventional operations for well production evaluation register the reservoir response using downhole memory gauges, and the data recorded can be read only when they are retrieved at surface—after the evaluation has been completed. This conventional method failed to notify the operator when problems were encountered, which wasted resources, delayed decision making, and acquired potentially unreliable data.
The well production evaluation registered an abnormally high downhole pressure. The well was producing 2,050 bbl/d with 100% basic sediment and water, and the ACTive PTC tool's downhole sensors were reading a 2,984-psi [20.6-MPa] downhole flowing pressure. This pressure did not match the estimated reservoir pressure of the zone of interest, which was 1,900 psi [13.1 MPa]. After eight hours of flowing the well, the operator decided to perform a pressure buildup test to further analyze the well. The pressure buildup was registered with the ACTive PTC tool downhole sensors, showing a reservoir pressure of 4,000 psi [27.6 MPa], confirming that the well production was from another formation. Using the fiber optics inside the CT string, distributed temperature sensing (DTS) profiling was performed and identified crossflow between two zones behind the well casing. A remedial cement job was scheduled to resolve the problem.
With the conventional method, the operator would have had to evaluate the well for several days while the reservoir pressure dropped and water cut stabilized and would not have been able to confirm the source of the water. Using real-time data at surface, the operator identified the crossflow behind the casing and completed the buildup test and well production evaluation in only 17 hours, saving several days of rig time.
Challenge: Improve well production evaluation cost and rig time by eliminating the downhole uncertainty associated with traditional methods, which use hydraulic jet pumping and memory gauges
Solution:
Results: