Accurate Pore Pressure Prediction in HPHT Well Reduces Risk, Saves Rig Time | SLB

Accurate Pore Pressure Prediction in HPHT Well Reduces Risk, Saves Rig Time

Published: 10/17/2012

Blue hero texture

Drilling risk in a high-cost environment

As oil and gas exploration moves to HPHT environments, it is a challenge to drill wells without the risk of NPT caused by unplanned events. The cost of these NPT incidents has been further increased by higher rig-day rates. For a GOM operator, offset wells near its exploration well had experienced up to 10 days of NPT from stuck pipe, kicks, lost returns, and the need to sidetrack, and current rig rates approaching USD 100,000 per day could cause cost overruns from hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars.

There were three main drilling challenges. It was important to find the optimal depth for the 13 5⁄8-in casing; drilling into the anticipated overpressured zone without experiencing losses and wellbore instability problems would be difficult if the casing was set too shallow.

Accurate Pore Pressure Prediction in HPHT Well Reduces Risk, Saves Rig Time
In-depth 3D velocity model (left) and pore pressure prediction (right) in equivalent mud weight using the seismic velocities for the 50-mi2 area.

Optimizing the mud weight program and planned equivalent circulating density (ECD) was important to minimize wellbore instability in the 9 7⁄8-in and 8 1⁄2-in hole sections, which had a narrow ~1.0 lbm/gal safe mud weight window. Finally, insufficient offset data were available to calibrate the predrill model in the 8 1⁄2-in hole section, where temperature exceeded 300 degF [149 degC] and pressure reached approximately 18,500 psi [128 MPa].

To mitigate these risks, the operator worked with the Schlumberger petrotechnical services for geomechanics team to provide a prejob plan and real-time updates during drilling operations.

Accurate Pore Pressure Prediction in HPHT Well Reduces Risk, Saves Rig Time
Velocity-effective stress relationship in the area showing type 1 (loading) and type 2 (unloading) pressure regimes.

Predrill modeling to real-time monitoring and updating

During the planning stage, the geomechanics team used high-quality 3D prestack time migration seismic velocity to determine the pore pressure and fracture gradient in a 50-mi2 area. A locally calibrated overburden stress field was derived from density logs, and a velocity-to-effectivestresstransformation was established using detailed analysis of the offset well data. The team then performed a dipping-sand analysis to calculate pressures in three sands at the location of interest.

The team identified the root cause of drilling problems in the area and provided guidelines for the safer mud weight window using Schlumberger DrillMAP drilling planning and management tool.

Schlumberger then acquired real-time measurements for advanced drilling optimization. The acquisition of new data enabled the PERFORM performance through risk management process engineer to monitor the model on the rig in real time and the geomechanics engineers to make daily updates for an improved prediction ahead of the bit.

Drilling success with no NPT

Using the results from the predrill model and the application of real-time monitoring and updating, the 13 5⁄8-in casing depth was successfully extended from 11,200 ft to11,821 ft [3,414 m to 3,603 m], enabling the operator to eliminate the 10 5⁄8-in × 12 1⁄4-in expandable liner in the lower part of the well. The mud weight and casing programs were optimized to avoid well-control and wellbore-instability issues, allowing successful drilling to a TD of 20,500 ft [6,248 m] without nonproductive time.

The real-time sonic measurement and geomechanics monitoring and updating enabled the operator to make informed decisions during the drilling operation and prevent minor problems from becoming catastrophic. As a result, the well was drilled on schedule.

Location
Gulf of Mexico, United States, North America, Offshore
Details

Challenge: Drill 20,500-ft [6,250-m] well in an HPHT environment, preventing lost-time incidents.

Solution:

  • Analyze cause of drilling problems in area
  • Create pore pressure and wellbore stability models
  • Perform dipping sand analysis to calculate pressures in sands
  • Establish guidelines for safe mud-weight window

Results:

  • Well drilled without nonproductive time (NPT)
  • No cost overruns from NPT incidents
Products Used